Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Shorter week in the office with the Christmas break.  With that being said, I found more time than the past few weeks to read through some great articles.  In particular, the analysis of how the Democratic party has become so closely intertwined with the Fight for $15 movement was a fascinating read.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Four Non-Compete and Confidentiality Agreement Issues On the Horizon for 2016

Over at Jackson Lewis, an article was recently put out in regard to four non-compete and confidentiality agreement issues that are likely to become major issues in 2016.  Readers should note that the article goes beyond just identifying these four big issues.  Instead, the article also points to recent cases from around the country and shows the split that exists among many states/circuits.  Well worth a read.


The Fight for a $15 Minimum Wage & Its Ties to the Democratic Party

Bryce Covert has a well written article that ties the Fight for $15 movement to the Democratic party and how the party has essentially become engulfed in this cause over the past few years.  Interesting to follow the article as it traces the initial push for a higher minimum wage and how over the past few years, more and more Democrats have started to make this one of their primary causes to advocate.  Of note, pay attention to the timeline to show where Democrats "started" a few years ago, and where they stand on the issue now.  


5 Things to Remember About the California Salary Basis Test

The California Employment Law Report always has some good articles every week.  This one is no exception.  Anthony Zaller points readers to several key takeaways when dealing with the salary basis test in California.  Of note, Zaller identifies key portions of the labor code and relevant caselaw to give employers a guide on areas to pay close attention to in an effort to avoid slip ups with the salary basis test.  Even for those who do not practice/work in California, this is an interesting read!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more