Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Steve Sarkisian Edition


Over the past week or so, I have had several trials which have kept me busy.  As a result, I have again not had as much time to read through articles as I would have liked.  With that being said, I came across several articles that I think readers will enjoy in regard to the recent wrongful termination suit filed by former Southern California Coach Steve Sarkisian.  This one is just getting started and warrants a special post.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


A Closer Look at Steve Sarkisian's Lawsuit Against Southern California

Sports Illustrated has a well written, in depth look at the $30 million wrongful termination suit that former Southern California Coach Steve Sarkisian brought against the school after he was terminated earlier this year.  (Coach Steve Sarkisian Fired From Southern California).  In his suit, Sarkisian alleged that he was wrongfully terminated because of a disability, due to being an alcoholic.  Southern California will likely argue that even if Sarkisian suffered from a disability, the University complied with the law.  Even if Sarkisian had requested an accommodation for his disability, I would expect Southern California to allege that the accommodation request exceeded what would be considered "reasonable" under the Americans With Disabilities Act. 



The Los Angeles Times has a good note on Southern California's response to Steve Sarkisian's wrongful termination lawsuit.  As of this point, the University has not filed a formal response in court.  However, they have stated that "Much of what is stated in the [Sarkisian] lawsuit...is patently untrue."  What will likely become a major issue as the wrongful termination claim proceeds is whether Sarkisian informed the University of his need for help and whether he resisted efforts to obtain help.  As of now, Southern California has alleged that Sarkisian failed to do this...something that contradicts what was alleged in Sarkisian's lawsuit.  



As former Coach Steve Sarkisian's wrongful termination suit proceeds, the spotlight will likely turn on what Southern California Athletic Director Pat Haden did or did not say and what he did or did not do once he was aware of a potential issue with Sarkisian.  The Orange County Register's writer, Jeff Miller, has a fascinating look at how that relationship between Sarkisian and Haden could be what this case turns on...and who a jury finds to be more believable.  If you believe Sarkisian, the University and Haden did not accommodate his disability and wrongfully terminated Sarkisian when he sought treatment.  If you believe the University and Haden, Sarkisian never made Southern California aware of a disability and even resisted the University's attempts to help him.  This will be interesting to watch unfold.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

Happening Tomorrow: Connecticut’s Minimum Wage Increases

For those employers and employees alike in Connecticut, mark your calendars as tomorrow, the minimum wage rate increases in the state from $13/hour to $14/hour. This wage hike comes after Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont had signed Public Act 19-4 into law in 2019 which progressively raised the state’s hourly minimum wage rate every year for five years.  In fact, next year, the hourly wage rate will top out at $15/hour.  Beginning in January of 2024, the hourly wage rate will be indexed to the employment cost index. For additional information:   https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-the-Governor/News/Press-Releases/2022/06-2022/Governor-Lamont-Reminds-Residents-That-Minimum-Wage-Is-Scheduled-To-Increase-on-Friday
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more