Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Steve Sarkisian Edition


Over the past week or so, I have had several trials which have kept me busy.  As a result, I have again not had as much time to read through articles as I would have liked.  With that being said, I came across several articles that I think readers will enjoy in regard to the recent wrongful termination suit filed by former Southern California Coach Steve Sarkisian.  This one is just getting started and warrants a special post.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


A Closer Look at Steve Sarkisian's Lawsuit Against Southern California

Sports Illustrated has a well written, in depth look at the $30 million wrongful termination suit that former Southern California Coach Steve Sarkisian brought against the school after he was terminated earlier this year.  (Coach Steve Sarkisian Fired From Southern California).  In his suit, Sarkisian alleged that he was wrongfully terminated because of a disability, due to being an alcoholic.  Southern California will likely argue that even if Sarkisian suffered from a disability, the University complied with the law.  Even if Sarkisian had requested an accommodation for his disability, I would expect Southern California to allege that the accommodation request exceeded what would be considered "reasonable" under the Americans With Disabilities Act. 



The Los Angeles Times has a good note on Southern California's response to Steve Sarkisian's wrongful termination lawsuit.  As of this point, the University has not filed a formal response in court.  However, they have stated that "Much of what is stated in the [Sarkisian] lawsuit...is patently untrue."  What will likely become a major issue as the wrongful termination claim proceeds is whether Sarkisian informed the University of his need for help and whether he resisted efforts to obtain help.  As of now, Southern California has alleged that Sarkisian failed to do this...something that contradicts what was alleged in Sarkisian's lawsuit.  



As former Coach Steve Sarkisian's wrongful termination suit proceeds, the spotlight will likely turn on what Southern California Athletic Director Pat Haden did or did not say and what he did or did not do once he was aware of a potential issue with Sarkisian.  The Orange County Register's writer, Jeff Miller, has a fascinating look at how that relationship between Sarkisian and Haden could be what this case turns on...and who a jury finds to be more believable.  If you believe Sarkisian, the University and Haden did not accommodate his disability and wrongfully terminated Sarkisian when he sought treatment.  If you believe the University and Haden, Sarkisian never made Southern California aware of a disability and even resisted the University's attempts to help him.  This will be interesting to watch unfold.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more