Skip to main content

New Laws for 2016: "Labor Dispute" Exemption for Unions Removed (PA)


Recently, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf signed a bill into law that repealed a loophole that gave unions the right to stalk, harass, and even use a "weapon of mass destruction" if they were involved in a labor dispute in Pennsylvania, without fear of being charged with one of those three crimes.

In the past, it had been well documented that unions harassed the children and spouses of business executives with violent taunts and even death threats.  A company official involved in a labor dispute in Philadelphia said that union workers had videotaped her children at sports events and threatened to shoot her.  A company executive for another company was talked by union workers.  When she went to a restaurant, she was taunted and threatened that she would be shot. 

However, under the law at the time, these business people had no legal recourse to prevent the harassment or have those who perpetrated the crimes arrested.  In the instance of the executive who was stalked and taunted at the restaurant, her case was thrown out because of the loopholes.  In fact, the judge said "When you walk in, as a vice president of a company, to a restaurant full of union workers, you're going to hear some things you should have expected to hear."  Well true, I might expect to be taunted and have someone threaten to shoot me if I am a company executive involved in a labor dispute.  But call me crazy, but I would expect to have some legal rights if I was physically threatened.  I do not think that is asking too much...

Under this new law, employers and employees alike would be protected from these type of hostile work environment situations and threatening tactics, as the law intends that the exemptions previously in place would not apply in labor disputes. 

Unsurprisingly, the Pennsylvania chapter of the AFL-CIO has opposed the measure as anti-worker.  Yes, you read that right.  Apparently these loopholes are pro-worker, in the minds of some.


For additional information:  https://www.governor.pa.gov/governor-wolf-signs-bill-removing-exemptions-for-labor-disputes/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...