Skip to main content

Hillary Clinton Supports $12 Per Hour Minimum Wage


A week or so ago, Hillary Clinton announced her support for a $12 per hour minimum wage rate.  Some of you may have heard she is running for President...some of you may also know that as a Democrat, she has a base that she needs to cater towards if she wants to win the Democratic nomination.  

In her announcement, Clinton indicated that she believes a $12 per hour minimum wage for federal workers is justified based upon the cost of living across the country.  However, Clinton's support of a $12 per hour wage rate is less than the $15 per hour wage rate advocated for by Bernie Sanders and Martin O'Malley.  Note, Sanders and O'Malley are Clinton's two main opponents for the Democratic nomination.  In a nod to her adopted home state of Arkansas, Clinton noted that $15 per hour in rural areas or smaller cities such as Little Rock might be too much.  Given the lower cost of living in these areas, Clinton suggested that $12 per hour is a more suitable wage rate.

Back in August, Clinton lent her support to a bill introduced by Senator Patty Murray and Congressman Bobby Scott that would set the minimum wage rate at $12 per hour.  

Time will tell whether Clinton's support of a $12 per hour minimum wage rate (or even the support others have given to a $15 per hour minimum wage rate) will have any impact and actually prove to be effective in bringing about a change.  For the time being, however, these candidates have a base they need to play to...the Democratic nomination hangs in the balance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...