Skip to main content

Fight for Minimum Wage for N.F.L. Cheerleaders Gains Steam


In the past month, there have been several developments in regard to the wage and hour claims brought by N.F.L. cheerleaders against the league and the teams they cheer for.  

On September 9, approximately 19 Congressmen from around the country sent a letter to Commissioner Roger Goodell and advocated for minimum wage for these cheerleaders and to designate them as employees.  As the letter pointed out, the FLSA affords these cheerleaders protections from wage theft which they allege is occurring throughout the league.  

In a subtle jab to the lack of action by the N.F.L., the letter notes that California passed a bill to address the wage theft in regard to these cheerleaders.  As well, the letter drew attention to a similar bill that is pending in New York.

The letter closed with a request that the N.F.L. do something about this issue, given that females make up approximately 45% of the fan base.  In addition, the Congressmen implored the N.F.L. to take the opportunity to take a stand on the issue and be proactive on the matter.  

In response, the N.F.L. stated that it supports "fair employment practices."  As well, the league noted that the teams which have cheerleaders "are expected to comply with federal and state wage laws."  I do not know about you, but it sounds like the league is "punting" on the issue and placing the blame (and burden) on the individual teams...


A copy of the letter can be found here:  https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2388591/2015-09-09-letter-to-nfl-commissioner-final.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...