Skip to main content

Barstool Sports Bloggers Arrested for Protesting Brady Suspension: Can Employees Be Forced to Participate in Illegal Activity?


Last week, four bloggers from Barstool Sports were arrested at N.F.L. headquarters in New York for staging a sit in as a response to the N.F.L.'s suspension and fines associated with "Deflategate".  The owner of the company, David Portnoy, brought along three employees and engaged in a protest in front of the building, then later handcuffed themselves inside the lobby of the building and chanted pro-Tom Brady and anti-NFL messages.  Unsurprisingly, and as they had predicted before going to protest at N.F.L. headquarters, the NYPD arrested all four and held them overnight before going before a judge the next morning.  

While all four maintained that they protested and were arrested without being forced to participate, this begs the question:  What does an employee do when their employer forces them to engage in illegal activity?  

In this case, the employees who joined Portnoy had to know that once they handcuffed themselves in the N.F.L. lobby and refused to leave, they would be arrested for trespass.  While none of the employees appeared to have been forced to join, they had to know that they would engage in illegal activity at the direction of their boss.  Had one of them refused to participate, it is possible that they could have been subjected to discipline or termination by Portnoy.  If that had happened, one of these Barstool employees could have a claim for wrongful termination.  Note, an employer cannot force an employee to engage in illegal activity.  An employee who refuses to engage in illegal activity and then is subsequently terminated for failing to participate has grounds to sue their employer for an unlawful termination.

While this story might be humorous and an example of taking things a little too far (I doubt four guys handcuffed and sitting in the N.F.L. lobby is going to reverse a suspension and fine...but that's just me), it is a good reminder for employers and employees alike:  Directing employees to undertake certain actions or perform specific job related tasks is likely ok.  However, when an employee is instructed to participate in an illegal activity and refuses, employers should be very careful about taking adverse employment actions against that employee. 


Coverage from Barstool Sports:  http://www.barstoolsports.com/chicago/justice/


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Senator Bernie Sanders To Introduce Bill Requiring Large Corporations To Pay For Federal Assistance Programs

Next week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to introduce legislation which would require large employers such as Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's to fully cover the cost of food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and other federal assistance programs that their employees receive.  Senator Sanders has stated that the goal is to force these large employers to pay their employees a living wage and cut back on the nearly $150 billion in taxpayer dollars that go toward funding these federal programs every year. As for the specifics, a 100% tax on government benefits received would be imposed on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees.  For instance, if a Walmart employee received $500 in food stamps, Walmart would be taxed $500. To call this proposed legislation groundbreaking would be an understatement.  I would expect that Senator Sanders, an Independent that caucuses with Democrats, is going to face an uphill battle gett...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more