Skip to main content

Illinois Governor Proposes Right to Work "Zones"


Recently, Illinois Governor Bruce Rauner has proposed Right to Work "zones" in the state in which voters and local communities could decide whether or not employees should be forced to join a union as a condition of employment.  Of course, this follows on the heels of the Governor's Executive Order in regard to "fair share" union dues (Unions Sue to Halt Fair Share Executive Order).  

For those keeping track, 25 states have passed Right to Work legislation.  Unlike those states where Right to Work legislation impacts all workers in the state, these proposed Right to Work zones would mean that depending on what city/county a worker is in could determine whether the Right to Work Act applied.  

Some readers might question why the Governor would not attempt to make this a statewide law.  For those not as familiar with Illinois politics, the state tends to lean Democratic (notwithstanding the fact that the state elected Republican Governor Rauner...).  Still, as the Governor has noted, any attempt to pass Right to Work legislation that would apply to workers all over the state would be difficult to pass.  Consequently, that is why the Governor proposed these Right to Work zones. 

Unsurprisingly, unions and some of the more liberal cities (such as Chicago) have indicated they will fight these Right to Work zones and do what they can to prevent them from becoming a reality.  Time will tell how many cities prevent these Right to Work zones from becoming law...but something tells me this will be a long, drawn out battle across the state for the foreseeable future.


Additional information can be found here:  http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/aurora-beacon-news/news/ct-abn-oswego-rauner-st-0402-20150401-story.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more