Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: California Edition (3/20)


Every so often, a find a few articles any given week on labor & employment law related issues in a particular state that I think deserve special attention.  In this case, there are several good articles on a few different labor & employment law related issues in California that I want to highlight.  This post runs the gamut from office betting pools, to days of rest under the California Labor Code, all the way to Oakland's new minimum wage and paid sick leave laws (and do not forget the additional article on document review workers and their FLSA fight)...wow!

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Office Betting Pools in California: Legal...or Not?

Anytime there is a big sporting event, whether it be the Super Bowl, March Madness, the World Series, etc., office betting pools start up.  The question then becomes, are these pools legal?  Jeffrey Polsky has a quick note on how these office betting pools are "technically" illegal in California and includes a few thoughts for both employers and employees to consider.


Five Issues California Employers Should Note in Regard to 1 Day of Rest for Every 7 Days Worked

Anthony Zaller has a good article on a few things California employers should review, in regard to the California Labor Code's requirement of one day of rest for every seven days worked.  Zaller notes that a recent request from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, who requested clarification from the California Supreme Court on Mendoza v. Nordstrom, has brought this provision of the California Labor Code to light and consequently listed a few things that California employers should review.  Well worth a read!


Oakland Minimum Wage and Paid Sick Leave Become Effective

This article serves as a good reminder for Bay Area employers and employees that minimum wage and sick leave laws took effect March 2, 2015.  As a result, employers need to ensure they are complying with these new laws or risk penalty.  This article provides a few timely reminders and suggested recommendations to employers.


Document Review Workers - Does the FLSA Apply?

Ok, admittedly, maybe this one is a bit of a stretch to fit into the "California Edition" of this post.  But, it deals with an issue that impacts attorneys across the country, including some friends I know who do document review work in California.  This particular article takes a look at whether document review workers are entitled to the protections of the FLSA (namely the right to overtime wages).  The main issue boils down to whether document review work amounts to engaging in the practice of law.  If the answer is yes, then these workers are not entitled to overtime.  However, if the answer is no, these document review workers are entitled to overtime.  The article notes a few cases that have been filed on the issue that readers might enjoy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...