Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Social Media Edition


It was a busy week for me so I did not have as much time as I would have liked to read through my normal amount of articles and cases.  With that being said, I did find a few articles dealing with social media in the workplace that I wanted to highlight.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.



This is a rather well written piece by Michael Haberman that deals with who (and how) an employer can fire for social media activity.  The article breaks down who is covered by the protections of the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") and what kind of discipline an employer can levy.  I would suggest employers give this one a read through...there are several important things to keep in mind when an employer wants to fire an employee for their social media activity and this article does a good job addressing that.



Hunter Johnson has a few thoughts on steps employers should take to avoid liability when they search an employee's device.  The best part of the article and one that I would steer readers towards is the section in which Johnson gives advice on what an employer can do to avoid being accused of illegally looking at employee's private information.


On the Job & Wanting to Post Something on Social Media? Think it Through First

The Huffington Post has a short article on a school bus driver in Ohio who took a selfie of what appeared to be her drinking a bottle of beer on the bus, posted it on Facebook, and subsequently got fired.  An investigation later revealed the driver was off duty, no children were on the bus, and the bottle of beer was not actually open.  It goes without saying that whatever an employee posts on social media (especially while on the job), should be done very carefully and with an eye towards what people may interpret the post as meaning.  Even though the driver in this case was not actually drinking and was not on duty, this was an avoidable situation that the employee should have thought twice about before posting a picture on social media. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...