Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Shorter week for me as I have been out of the office all week on vacation and in court.  As a result, I am lighter on time than normal, so excuse the brief post.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.



Service Animals in the Workplace

I normally do not come across many articles on service animals in the workplace and how an employer should handle this situation.  With that being said, I came across this article and it has some good thoughts and practical pointers that I thought readers would enjoy.  In particular, note that the article advises employers on how to act when an employee and a customer require the use of a service animal in the workplace.  As well, do not forget the last part of the article which highlights the two questions that an employer can ask as to the use of service animals in the workplace.


Three Things A General Counsel Should Watch Out For With a Company's Instagram Page

I would suggest that any owner/executive/manager of any company should be mindful of what is on its company's social media pages.  In this particular article though, Daniel Taylor has a few quick thoughts on what a general counsel of a company should look out for if a company has an Instagram page.  The three highlighted areas are somewhat commonsense for many general counsels...but still worth reviewing.



The Evil HR Lady is a well written blog that I take a look at every week.  This week, she detailed a situation in which she was terminated from her position as a writer for MoneyWatch and how things have played out as a terminated employee.  Normally she is on the employer's side doing the actual termination...but this is an interesting, albeit short, perspective of sitting on the other side of the termination table.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...