Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


A couple good articles this week that cover a pretty broad spectrum of employment law issues.  In particular, the note about how Illinois will soon allow employers to pay employee wages via payroll cards sounds interesting...and also like it could lead to several lawsuits.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Illinois to Now Allow Employers to Pay Wages Via Payroll Cards

Jeffrey Ruzal has a good note on the soon to be effective law that will allow Illinois employers to pay their employees by way of a payroll card.  Of course, employees must agree to be a part of this program...no employee can be forced to participate.  Jeffrey has a few thoughts and reminders for employers who decide to go down this road.  Food for thought.


A California Employee is Fired/Quits - A Reminder on When the Final Paycheck is Due

Earlier this year, I wrote a blog on how the final paycheck of a Texas employee is handled.  This particular article deals with when the final paycheck is due to a California employee who is fired or quits.  Brian Long does a good job of not just explaining the basics of the law, but also throws out a few examples of tricky situations that can arise with this law and how employers can limit potential liability.  Well worth the read.


Reminder on Keeping & Maintaining Employment Records

Every employer has employee related documents that deal with employee pay, accidents, complaints, etc.  The question often arises about how these records should be kept and maintained.  This article has a few good reminders on the requirements that employers must follow when keeping and maintaining certain employment records.  Even for those employers who are caught up on the law, this is still a good review. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...