Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: New Laws Edition


I only came across a few articles this week that really jumped out at me; namely a couple that deal with new laws that will impact California and Massachusetts employers an employees over the next few months.  I always caution employers (and employees) in states with new employment laws like these to take the time to review the specifics of the law...failure to do so could open both employers and employees up for unwanted (and avoidable) exposure.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


6 Steps California Employers Should Take in Preparation for AB 1897

This is one of the better articles I have come across in regard to the impact that AB 1897 is going to have on California employers starting January 1, 2015.  For those not familiar with AB 1897, California employers will now be on the hook when labor contractors fail to follow the law.  (ie  a California employer has a labor contractor provide workers.  The labor contractor classifies the workers as independent contractors but the government rules they are actually employees.  Guess what California employer?  You are now on the hook too).  This article has a few things that employers should review ahead of AB 1897 becoming a law.  


Massachusetts Voters Approve Paid Sick Leave Law

Earlier this month on election day, voters in Massachusetts approved a paid sick leave law (referred to on ballots as Massachusetts Ballot Question 4.  Under the law set to take effect on July 1, 2015, employees that work in Massachusetts are entitled to earn and use sick time.  In essence, employees who work for employers that have 11 or more employees may earn up to 40 hours of paid sick time per calendar year.  Employees who work for employers with 10 or fewer employees may earn and use up to 40 hours of unpaid sick time per calendar year.  The article I have linked to this note includes additional information that both Massachusetts employers and employees should review.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more