Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Labor Law Edition


Every so often, I come across a few good articles on a particular topic during the week that warrant a "What I've Been Reading This Week" post dedicated solely to that topic.  This week was no exception as there were several good labor law articles I came across that caught my attention.  As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Southwest is on the Rise, But Will Labor Issues Ground Them?

Bloomberg Businessweek has a good article on the potential labor union issues that Southwest is facing.  A few weeks ago, Southwest rebranded itself by way of a new logo, designs on planes, etc. to much fanfare.  What has not been talked about as much, as of yet, is the growing rumbling among its employees over negotiations over their contracts.  This is one to keep an eye on.


A Look at How Unions Are Shrinking & the Subsequent Impact

What better way to start a Labor Law Edition blog than to start with the basics.  This article takes an in depth look at how labor unions have shrunk over the years in the U.S. and the effect that has had.  The article uses 7 different charts to walk the reader through the decreasing presence of unions in the workplace.  One of the things I found most surprising was that while union membership has decreased significantly over the past few decades, public support has remained relatively consistent, around the 50% mark.  Interesting...and somewhat surprising. 


What Unions No Longer Do

Justin Fox has a somewhat unique look at what labor unions no longer do in today's work environment.  As the above article showed, unions have been around for decades, and with declining membership especially in the private sector, the roles of unions have changed.  Justin has a few interesting points to read through on areas in which unions no longer play a role.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations