Skip to main content

New Laws for 2014: Ban the Box (District of Columbia)


Each state has a host of new employment and labor related laws that take effect in 2014. This series focuses on several new laws from around the country that are of particular interest.  In this instance, this note focuses on a new regulation that affects many San Francisco based employers.


After several other states and cities have passed "Ban the Box" measures, the District of Columbia has followed suit and passed a law of their own that prohibits employers from asking about a job applicant's criminal history until after a conditional job offer is made.  Bear in mind though that employers may still decline to consider an applicant further based on his or her qualifications, interview performance, and even Internet searches of applicants, provided that the decision is not based on any criminal background information.

Some key points of the Fair Criminal Record Screening Act of 2014 (the official name of D.C.'s Ban the Box legislation):

  1. The Act covers employers with more than 10 employees in Washington, D.C., but is limited to job applicants, rather than including existing employees; 
  2. Employers who would be covered under the Act, based on their size, are exempt from this Act if:  a) a background check is required of the industry by federal, state, or local law, b) the applicant volunteers the information without being asked, and/or c) the employer "provides programs, services, or direct care to minors or vulnerable adults" (ie  caregiving and child care services)

Of course, once an employer makes a conditional job offer to an applicant, a background check may then be performed and a job offer may be withdrawn for a "legitimate business reason" after the background check is completed.  In regard to the background check, the employer can only consider criminal convictions and pending criminal proceedings when deciding whether to withdraw a job offer.  Note, however, that considering an arrest or any "criminal accusation" not resulting in a conviction is prohibited.

Unlike other Ban the Box legislation, before this Act can become law, it must first be approved by D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray and by Congress.  (Note that the Mayor has previously expressed support for the bill).


Additional information on the topic can be found here:  http://lims.dccouncil.us/_layouts/15/uploader/Download.aspx?legislationid=30954&filename=B20-0642-Amendment3.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...