Skip to main content

New Laws for 2014: Ban the Box (District of Columbia)


Each state has a host of new employment and labor related laws that take effect in 2014. This series focuses on several new laws from around the country that are of particular interest.  In this instance, this note focuses on a new regulation that affects many San Francisco based employers.


After several other states and cities have passed "Ban the Box" measures, the District of Columbia has followed suit and passed a law of their own that prohibits employers from asking about a job applicant's criminal history until after a conditional job offer is made.  Bear in mind though that employers may still decline to consider an applicant further based on his or her qualifications, interview performance, and even Internet searches of applicants, provided that the decision is not based on any criminal background information.

Some key points of the Fair Criminal Record Screening Act of 2014 (the official name of D.C.'s Ban the Box legislation):

  1. The Act covers employers with more than 10 employees in Washington, D.C., but is limited to job applicants, rather than including existing employees; 
  2. Employers who would be covered under the Act, based on their size, are exempt from this Act if:  a) a background check is required of the industry by federal, state, or local law, b) the applicant volunteers the information without being asked, and/or c) the employer "provides programs, services, or direct care to minors or vulnerable adults" (ie  caregiving and child care services)

Of course, once an employer makes a conditional job offer to an applicant, a background check may then be performed and a job offer may be withdrawn for a "legitimate business reason" after the background check is completed.  In regard to the background check, the employer can only consider criminal convictions and pending criminal proceedings when deciding whether to withdraw a job offer.  Note, however, that considering an arrest or any "criminal accusation" not resulting in a conviction is prohibited.

Unlike other Ban the Box legislation, before this Act can become law, it must first be approved by D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray and by Congress.  (Note that the Mayor has previously expressed support for the bill).


Additional information on the topic can be found here:  http://lims.dccouncil.us/_layouts/15/uploader/Download.aspx?legislationid=30954&filename=B20-0642-Amendment3.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies i...
Post a Comment
Read more

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...
Post a Comment
Read more