Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Some very interesting reading this week.  My favorite by far was the article on the Suitable Seating Requirement in California.  This is one of the finer legal issues that is being litigated across the state which has led to some very interesting litigation.


How Will the Suitable Seating Requirement Impact the Hospitality Industry?

One of the more interesting legal issues surrounds how the "suitable seating" provision in California will impact the hospitality industry.  The suitable seating requirement requires some employers to provide "suitable seating" to some employees when the "nature of the work" would "reasonably permit it."  There is a great deal of confusion about the interpretation of this law which has left court's (and parties) unsure of how it applies.  The issue is currently before the California Supreme Court for clarification.  Michael Kun has a few thoughts about the issue and how the interpretation of the suitable seating provision could impact employers and employees in the hospitality industry.


Make Sure to Follow Up With Complaining Party at End of Workplace Investigation

While it may seem commonsense, this brief article notes the importance of following up with the complaining party at the end of a workplace investigation.  This note reminds employers of the importance of providing the complaining party with at the very least, a conclusion of the investigation results.


Putting Together a Sensible Social Media Policy

Jason Shinn has a good article on whether employers should be able to monitor their employees' social media posts as well as whether social media posts should be considered in the interview process.  The article includes a good discussion of the factors that should be balanced when considering what type of social media policy to set and includes a few insightful benefits and possible harms that could arise.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more