Skip to main content

Firefighter Afraid of Enterning Burning Building Brings ADA Claim: No Disability Discrimination


City of Houston v. Proler - Texas Supreme Court


Facts: Shayn Proler was a firefighter with the Houston fire department.  After a fellow firefighter complained that Proler refused to enter a burning apartment building, Proler was reassigned to the firefighter training academy for a period of time.  Proler was later transferred back to the firefighter crew and experienced an incident at a house fire in which he was unable to take orders and had difficulty walking.  After he was taken to a hospital, he was diagnosed with "global transient amnesia."  A short time later, Proler was again assigned to the training academy.

Proler filed an administrative grievance and sought to be reassigned to the firefighter crew.  After an administrative appeal judge sided with Proler, the City of Houston appealed to a trial court and Proler counter sued for disability discrimination under state and federal law.  At trial, a jury found the City had discriminated against Proler because of his disability when he was reassigned to the training academy.  On appeal, the court of appeals affirmed the jury's verdict in favor of Proler.  The City of Houston subsequently appealed to the Texas Supreme Court. 

Holding:  The Texas Supreme Court reversed the lower courts and held that Proler's disability was not a motivating factor in the City's decision to reassign Proler to the training academy.  The Supreme Court noted that in determining disability, the issue turned on whether Proler was unable to perform the variety of tasks central to most people's everyday lives, not on whether Proler was unable to perform the tasks associated with his particular job.   

The Court held there was no evidence from which a reasonable and fair minded jury could conclude Proler was disabled.  Evidence presented to the jury showed that Proler was apparently unable to provide useful help to his firefighting team during actual fires on at least two occasions because of a fear over entering burning buildings.  The Court reasoned that Proler's inability to set aside the normal fear of entering a burning building was not a mental impairment that substantially limited a major life activity (which Proler would need to show in order to prevail on his disability discrimination claim).  

Judgment:  The Texas Supreme Court reversed the lower courts and held that Proler could not prevail upon his disability discrimination claim because he could not establish a disability that impacted the performance of tasks central to a person's everyday life.

The Takeaway:  The Supreme Court got it right here, based upon the record they had.  Having a fear of entering a burning building likely does not amount to a disability that made him unable to perform tasks central to most people's everyday lives.  There was sufficient evidence introduced at the trial court to establish that the disability that Proler complained of was not a determining factor in the City's decision to reassign him to the training academy.      

Majority Opinion Judge:  Judge Willett

Date:  June 6, 2014

Opinion:  http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/2014/jun/121006.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Senator Bernie Sanders To Introduce Bill Requiring Large Corporations To Pay For Federal Assistance Programs

Next week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to introduce legislation which would require large employers such as Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's to fully cover the cost of food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and other federal assistance programs that their employees receive.  Senator Sanders has stated that the goal is to force these large employers to pay their employees a living wage and cut back on the nearly $150 billion in taxpayer dollars that go toward funding these federal programs every year. As for the specifics, a 100% tax on government benefits received would be imposed on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees.  For instance, if a Walmart employee received $500 in food stamps, Walmart would be taxed $500. To call this proposed legislation groundbreaking would be an understatement.  I would expect that Senator Sanders, an Independent that caucuses with Democrats, is going to face an uphill battle gett...
Post a Comment
Read more