Andrews v. CBOCS West, Inc. - Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Facts: Ruth Andrews (a white employee) worked as a server at Cracker Barrel from 1999 through 2007. During a portion of this time, Andrews did not get along with her supervisor, J.J. Stewart (a black employee). In 2002, Andrews filed a discrimination claim against Cracker Barrel and settled a year later. Around the time of the settlement, Stewart told Andrews that she should "hope to God I never become GM because if I do, one of the first things I'm going to do is fire you."
In 2006, Stewart became general manager of the location that Andrews worked at and stated that it was a goal to make this location the first all-black Cracker Barrel. Andrews documented her interactions with Stewart, and noted that Stewart allegedly made regular comments about Andrews' age. Andrews kept record of several instances when Stewart called her "old woman", "old lady", and "grandma". Andrews provided these notes to a Cracker Barrel employee relations specialist who investigated the complaints but found no action was necessary.
Stewart began encouraging Andrews to transfer to another Cracker Barrel location. In November of 2007, Andrews asked Stewart to initiate the process of transferring to another location. Andrews did not apply for a formal transfer, however. Andrews then requested to take a three week paid vacation to cover the transfer period. Stewart approved the time off. After looking at the position that she would take at the new location, Andrews decided she did not want to transfer afterall.
Andrews was terminated on January 11, 2008 when Cracker Barrel's HR computer system generated a termination letter (this was apparently routine for employees who hadn't worked for more than three consecutive weeks). Andrews brought suit and alleged discrimination. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of Cracker Barrel.
In 2006, Stewart became general manager of the location that Andrews worked at and stated that it was a goal to make this location the first all-black Cracker Barrel. Andrews documented her interactions with Stewart, and noted that Stewart allegedly made regular comments about Andrews' age. Andrews kept record of several instances when Stewart called her "old woman", "old lady", and "grandma". Andrews provided these notes to a Cracker Barrel employee relations specialist who investigated the complaints but found no action was necessary.
Stewart began encouraging Andrews to transfer to another Cracker Barrel location. In November of 2007, Andrews asked Stewart to initiate the process of transferring to another location. Andrews did not apply for a formal transfer, however. Andrews then requested to take a three week paid vacation to cover the transfer period. Stewart approved the time off. After looking at the position that she would take at the new location, Andrews decided she did not want to transfer afterall.
Andrews was terminated on January 11, 2008 when Cracker Barrel's HR computer system generated a termination letter (this was apparently routine for employees who hadn't worked for more than three consecutive weeks). Andrews brought suit and alleged discrimination. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of Cracker Barrel.
Holding: The Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's ruling and held that Andrews could not state a prima facie case of discrimination. The Court noted that Andrews did not suffer a materially adverse employment action. In this case, Andrews voluntarily left her position. As a result, the Court held that "an employee who voluntarily resigns cannot be said to have experienced an adverse employment action."
In regard to any claim that Andrews was fired, the Court noted that the automatic termination occurred as a result of Andrews failing to show up for work after three straight weeks of paid leave. The Court held that this automatic termination was an "administrative formality precipitated by her voluntary absence."
In regard to any claim that Andrews was fired, the Court noted that the automatic termination occurred as a result of Andrews failing to show up for work after three straight weeks of paid leave. The Court held that this automatic termination was an "administrative formality precipitated by her voluntary absence."
The Takeaway: At the outset, I will note that Andrews did the right thing by keeping a record of the alleged discriminatory conduct. All too often, a party that alleges discrimination will fail to make a record or document alleged improper incidents. That in turn makes it much more difficult to bring a claim, let alone prevail on it.
In this case, what ultimately doomed Andrews was failing to formally apply for the transfer as well as her failure to return to her position (after she decided the new location was not a good fit for her). While there might have been some actionable discriminatory conduct by Stewart, and in turn Cracker Barrel, Andrews failed to properly appear for work, as required, which doomed her discrimination claims.
Judgment: The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's ruling and held that since Andrews failed to return from her vacation, she had no valid claim of discriminatory termination.
Majority Opinion Judge: Judge Sykes
Date: February 14, 2014
Opinion: http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2014/D02-14/C:12-3399:J:Sykes:aut:T:fnOp:N:1291695:S:0
Comments
Post a Comment