Skip to main content

College Football Players: Student Athletes & Now Union Members?


In a somewhat surprising turn of events, for the first time in the history of college sports, college athletes are asking to be represented by a labor union, taking formal steps on Tuesday to begin the process of being recognized as employees.  Ramogi Huma, president of the National College Players Association, filed the petition and union cards signed by an undisclosed number of Northwestern University football players in Chicago today.  In order to represented by a labor union, at least 30 percent of employees (in this case, at least 27 of the 85 scholarship Northwestern University players) need to be in favor of the union to file the document.  Huma did not say specifically how many players signed the cards, only that there was an "overwhelming majority."  The next step is a formal election, which is supervised by the National Labor Relations Board.

Northwestern released a statement and said it supports dialogue around the issues that are important to the union that could potentially represent the football players, and the right of the university's football players to have a voice in that dialogue.  However, Northwestern clarified that it does not support the players organizing through a labor union.

This will be a very interesting issue to keep an eye on.  Over the past few seasons, there has been a growing cry among current and former collegiate sports players for collegiate athletes to be paid. While the Northwestern player's attempts to seek union representation might not be a direct effort to get collegiate athletes paid, it does add fuel to the fire and pushes the issue of whether collegiate athletes are "employees" and therefore entitled to compensation closer to coming to a head. 


Chicago Tribune Article:  http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/college/chi-northwestern-football-players-labor-union-20140128,0,182603.story 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations