Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


To the surprise of very few, coronavirus related matters have dominated not only the news cycle the past few weeks but also employment and labor law related news.  While I hope to highlight a broader scope of articles next week, this week is pretty straight and to the point.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Labor Department Publishes Guidance on Families First Coronavirus Response Act

Many readers are likely wondering how (or if) the Families First Coronavirus Response Act will impact their ability to take paid leave while this pandemic plays out, given that Congress recently passed the legislation and President Donald Trump signed it into law.  Well look no further, the Labor Department released guidance for employers, employees, and a FAQ section on Monday.  For those looking for a break from their work from home routine, this resource is well worth a quick read.


Labor Unions Go to Bat to Get $58 Billion For Airline Industry

Yesterday, the U.S. Senate approved an aide package, in response to the impact the coronavirus pandemic has had on the economy.  That aide package includes approximately $58 billion earmarked for the aviation industry.  Unsurprisingly, prior to yesterday’s vote, that $58 billion earmark quickly came under fire.  However, Leslie Josephs over at CNBC has a good article which notes that labor unions pushed lawmakers for approval of that $58 billion dollar earmark.  Part of the selling point from the unions?  The money would go toward payroll (to help keep pilots, air crew, grounds crew, etc) employed...rather than the money going toward corporate bonuses or stock buybacks.  With the House of Representatives voting on the legislation today, will this $58 billion earmark stay in?  With a Democratic controlled (and labor friendly House), the unions might not have to do much convincing.  Stay tuned.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more