Skip to main content

Breaking: Families First Coronavirus Response Act Clears Congress


Minutes ago, the Families First Coronavirus Response Act cleared Congress, following this afternoon's 90 - 8 vote by the Senate approving the legislation.  The bill is now headed to President Donald Trump's desk for signature, which is expected shortly.

Readers will recall that the U.S. House had approved a version of the bill early Saturday morning, with a 363 - 40 vote in favor of passage (with one "present" vote from Michigan Representative Justin Amash and 26 no votes.)   Before the Senate voted, however, changes were made to the legislation.  Of note, two weeks of paid sick leave will be provided to many workers in the country working at companies with less than 500 employees.  (The pay rate is capped at $511/day.)  As well, paid family leave of up to twelve weeks will only be offered to parents caring for children that are home from school because of closures.  (A previous version of the legislation had this additional leave being offered to all workers that received paid sick leave in the original version.)  Small businesses with less than 50 employees will not be required to pay for sick leave or family leave at the discretion of the labor department.

Efforts to further scale back the paid leave, as originally drafted in the language of the bill, fell short after Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson's amendment failed to garner enough support.  (The Johnson Amendment had approximately 50 votes in favor of amending the legislation; however 60 votes are required to carry the amendment.)

At this time, I would expect President Trump to sign the bill into law, sooner rather than later.  Given that the President has indicated his support for the measure in prior days (and likely hungry for some good news), readers should expect to see the President put pen to paper quickly.


For additional information:  https://www.newsweek.com/families-first-coronavirus-bill-sent-senate-stripped-back-sick-leave-benefits-1492958

For additional information as to the legislation:  https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6201

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more