Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Some of us might be spending the day working while others might be enjoying the end of the week at a beach in Santa Monica (or somewhere in between.)  Regardless of where you find yourself, the below articles are worth a read to get caught up on some recent developments over the past few days.  We could likely devote a great deal of time to the coronavirus and how employers and employees alike are adapting to potential shutdowns in the workplace, but at a certain point, we would just be talking in circles about the matter.  While that article leads things off this week, there are a few other articles worth discussing, as highlighted below.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Trader Joe's Implements New Paid Sick Leave Plan to Help Employees Deal With Coronavirus

Kate Taylor and Hayley Peterson wrote an article earlier this week in which they noted that Trader Joe's has implemented a new paid sick leave plan that will allow workers to stay home if they feel under the weather and still be paid for their time off work.  (However, reimbursement of missed pay is left to the discretion of each employee's manager and an employee that misses a week or more of work will have their situation reviewed by HR.)  Regardless of whether some employees might use this policy to just take a day off (under the guise of being sick), it is commendable that the company is taking steps to encourage employees that are sick (or feel like they are coming down with something) to stay at home, rather than risk spreading anything to other employees or customers for that matter.  With fears over the coronavirus spreading over the past few weeks, I would not be surprised if other employers followed suit with similar amended paid leave plans or began to allow employees to work from home.



Perhaps this should have been the Paid Sick Leave Edition of this blog post, huh?  Readers might recall that several cities in Texas had previously approved local paid sick leave ordinances.  Business groups quickly scrambled to block implementation of these laws, with San Antonio's paid sick leave ordinance being one of the most contested.  (The San Antonio City Council had previously approved an ordinance that required employers in the city to provide paid sick leave in August of 2018.  That was postponed after a lawsuit was filed to block the ordinance's implementation.  An amendment to the ordinance was subsequently passed which would require paid sick leave for all full and part time employees, with these employees earning one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked.  A State District Judge held that the ordinance was preempted by a statewide minimum wage law and an injunction was granted back in November of 2019.  This appeal followed.)  With the ruling from the Fourth Court of Appeals, the injunction remains in place and a trial is currently set on the matter for September.  Stay tuned.


Two NLRB Members Re-Nominated For New Terms

Yesterday, the National Law Review noted that President Donald Trump had re-nominated National Labor Relations Board Members Lauren McFerran and Marvin Kaplan to new five year terms.  (NRLB Member McFerran was a President Barack Obama appointee; NLRB Member Kaplan was a President Trump nominee.)  Readers might be aware that the NLRB is made up of five Members, with two spots being reserved for the minority party (in this case, the Democrats.)  Currently, there are three Members on the NLRB:  Kaplan (whose term expires in August, which is why he has been re-nominated), Chairman John Ring, and William Emanuel.  NLRB Member Kaplan's term ended back in December.  While the NLRB only has three Members (comprised solely of President Trump nominees), there is a quorum which allows the NLRB to still issue decisions.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more