Skip to main content

Department of Labor Finds That Gig Workers Are Contractors, NOT Employees


Stop me if you have heard this before:  Gig workers have long argued that they are employees, not contractors, and therefore are entitled to the protections afforded under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA").  (For those readers that have been following along over the past few years, this argument should not come as much of a surprise.  After all, the Department of Labor has previously been thought to being ready to weigh in on the issue before...as has the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, a UK Court of Appeal, and a New York State Labor Review Board, among others.)

Well on Monday, the Department of Labor issued an opinion letter in which it said that gig workers at an unidentified company were contractors and therefore not employees entitled to the protections afforded under the FLSA.  (This particular company "connects service providers to end-market consumers to provide a wide variety of services, such as transportation, delivery, shopping, moving, cleaning, plumbing, painting, and household services."  The "issue" addressed here is whether the company was correct in classifying these gig workers as independent contractors rather than employees.)

One of the reasons pinpointed by the Department of Labor as to why these gig workers were contractors rather than employees was the fact that these workers had a great deal of control over their own work.  These gig workers were not requited to perform a minimum number of cleaning jobs, were allowed to sign up with other competing companies (or work directly with customers), and allowed these gig workers to ask for higher pay than had previously been set.  Now as some have noted, gig workers that work for Uber, GrubHub, Lyft, etc. have a different working relationship than what was addressed by the Department of Labor in this opinion letter.  (For instance, Uber & Lyft drivers have work rates that are determined by these companies' policies, could risk not being able to drive for Uber or Lyft if a driver rating falls below a certain threshold, etc.)

Now some readers might ask what binding precedential value this Department of Labor opinion letter holds.  I will preface this with a note that the opinion letter is not the be all, end all for either side's argument.  However, while the opinion letter is not binding in a court of law, it serves to add further ammo to the argument of those who seek to classify gig workers as contractors rather than employees.  With a Department of Labor under President Donald Trump that has tended to favor employers in recent years, I would expect similar employer friendly opinion letters going forward (should the Department of Labor delve further into the gig worker contractor v. employee dispute.)


For a copy of the Department of Labor's opinion letter:  https://www.dol.gov/whd/opinion/FLSA/2019/2019_04_29_06_FLSA.pdf
 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more