Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Hardly a week (or day) goes by that I do not come across articles on minimum wage issues in cities, towns, and states across the country.  This week was no exception as developments emerged on the minimum wage fight in Alabama and the University of Wisconsin, among others.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


A Look at the Employment Law Legacy of Justice Scalia

Readers have likely heard about the recent death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in February.  Over at the Orrick Employment Law and Litigation Blog, they have a good round up of the employment law legacy of Justice Scalia over the years.  Everything from his opinion in Wal-Mart v. Dukes to AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion is covered with an additional emphasis on what might happen to the current employment law cases pending before the Court.  Well worth a review!


Unease Continues Over NLRB's Franchisors & Joint-Employer Issue

Ron Ruggless has an interesting note about comments made at an International Franchise Association convention panel down in San Antonio late last month.  At the convention, it was suggested that franchisors should not panic over a December 2014 NLRB ruling which shifted the joint-employer status so franchisors could be held liable for employment actions taken by their franchisees.  At the convention, the panel pointed out that franchisors should do what is necessary to protect their brand image and not give up maintaining their brand standards.  Good advice, but little solace to some franchisors who are walking on egg shells now, fearful of this new joint-employer status.


The University of Wisconsin - Madison Raises Minimum Wage

Late last month, it was announced that the University of Wisconsin - Madison would raise its minimum wage rate for student employees from $7.25 to $9/hour starting next fall.  In addition, The Wisconsin State Journal noted that graduate assistants will see a 2% pay raise starting in July.  (Readers might remember New York Governor Andrew Cuomo's recent announcement of a $15/hour minimum wage rate for SUNY employees).  While $9/hour is still a far cry from $15/hour...this is a start.  It will be interesting to see if/when the minimum wage rate for these student employees increases...and how long it takes for another wage increase to take effect.


Pittsburgh Glass Works Loses Age Discrimination Case

In January, a jury found that Pittsburgh Glass Works ("PGW") unlawfully retaliated against a former employee who was going to file an age discrimination suit against the company.  The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette detailed that PGW was found to have violated age discrimination laws in 2010 when it fired an employee, who was 58 years old, that had worked at PGW (and its predecessor company) for over three decades.  After the worker (and several others in their 50's) filed a complaint with the EEOC, he was told that he could move up in the company if he "made the whole thing go away"...unfortunately, he was fired several weeks later.  

Employers, take note:  as the facts of the case laid out, PGW appeared to have violated the law by retaliating against the employee for his EEOC claim.  The penalty?  Over $900,000, plus attorney's fees.  Tread carefully!


Pro Hillary Clinton PACs Launch Equal Pay Ads

Interesting note from The New York Times in regard to recent ad buys by two PACs (political action committees) that support Hillary Clinton.  These two PACs have started to run ads that advocate for equal pay for women.  Readers might remember that I have highlighted several times that Hillary Clinton (and Bernie Sanders) has made equal pay a talking point on the campaign trail.  Granted, a few ad buys by these PACs likely will not tip the scales in either direction...but it does keep the equal pay issue at the forefront of the campaign and ensures it remains a talking point going forward.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...