Skip to main content

Ban the Box: Tennessee Edition


Earlier this week, the Tennessee House of Representatives approved a bill that would eliminate a question on a job applicant's criminal history when seeking a state government position.  While the bill does have some exemptions, such as still allowing the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, the state Department of Education, and the state Board of Education to still ask about an applicant's criminal history, this is a major development.  Advocates of this bill, and other "Ban the Box" measures around the country, argue that these laws are necessary to provide an equal opportunity to applicants that have been convicted of a crime.  

Since this bill has already been approved by the Tennessee Senate by a 25-7 vote, the measure heads to Governor Bill Haslam's desk for signature.  The Governor had previously stated that he would likely sign the legislation, if approved by the Tennessee Legislature.

For those wondering, there is another "Ban the Box" bill that is sitting on the Governor's desk.  That one is focused on privately owned companies that would be prohibited from asking about an applicant's criminal history on a job application.  I think that is a tougher bill to sign into law than this one for the simple reason that regulating the questions that can be asked for a state government position is one thing...but regulating the questions that can be asked in private industry is a tougher sell to the general public. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per