Skip to main content

Presidential Candidate Ben Carson Proposes Indexing the Minimum Wage


For those keeping track, the campaign for President has produced a few noteworthy proposals on the labor & employment law front recently.  In the past few weeks, Carly Fiorina voiced her opposition to mandatory maternity leave (Carly Fiorina Against Mandatory Maternity Leave) and Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker proposed a host of measures intended to limit the power of unions (Scott Walker Proposes Changes to the Union Landscape).  

At last night's Republican Presidential Debate in Simi Valley, California, candidate Ben Carson was presented with a question about minimum wage in the United States.  Carson stated that he was "probably" or "possibly" in favor of raising the minimum wage and suggested the federal minimum wage should be indexed.  Under this idea of indexing the minimum wage, the wage rate would increase automatically ever year (likely tying it to inflation).  

Not to be done there, Carson also indicated that it might make sense to have two tiers of the federal minimum wage:  One normal rate and a lower one for younger workers.  Under this idea, there would be a "starter and sustained" minimum wage.  Very interesting thought, especially for those who argue that someone working a minimum wage job at McDonald's or the local greasy spoon diner flipping burgers should not be making the same amount as someone working a minimum wage job as a legal assistant or bank teller.  Maybe there is some middle ground here?

Other noteworthy thoughts from the debate from other candidates on raising the minimum wage:  Although Scott Walker was asked his thoughts on raising the federal minimum wage of $7.25, he skirted the question and instead indicated that he was in favor of concentrating on giving Americans the education and skills needed to land jobs that paid more than the minimum wage.  That is certainly one way to play to the G.O.P. base, but an idea that could make sense.  Former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum also endorsed raising the minimum wage by $.50.  
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations