Skip to main content

Governor Scott Walker Proposes Sweeping Changes to the Union Landscape


Recently, Republican Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin proposed several changes to curb the power of unions in a proposed policy change that would be implemented if he were elected President.  For those who do not know, Governor Walker has battled unions in Wisconsin since becoming Governor a few years ago.  With his poll numbers sliding in his campaign for President, he has gone back to the well and focused on one of the topics he is more comfortable addressing (and has had a record of success).

Perhaps the most important changes in Walker's proposal include:  Making it illegal for federal employees to join a union; extending right to work laws across the country; and eliminating the National Labor Relations Board.


Eliminate Unions for Federal Employees

As for his proposal to eliminate unions for federal employees, Walker noted that in 2012, taxpayers apparently subsidized 3,395,187 hours of "official time" government union lobbying, including time spent negotiating collective bargaining agreements.  Walker stated that as Governor, he had seen the (negative) impact that big government unions have had on the government's ability to work on behalf of taxpayers.  Consequently, Walker's proposal to eliminate unions for federal employees is based upon the ideal that it would bring power back to the individual workers, rather than placing it in the hands of big unions.  

Extend Right to Work Laws Across the Country

Under Walker's proposal, he would change the default position in federal law to be Right to Work for all private, state, and local public sector workers.  In a concession of sorts, however, Walker indicated that states could affirmatively vote to opt out of Right to Work status.    

Eliminate the National Labor Relations Board

This is one of the parts of the proposal that caught me somewhat by surprise.  Walker pointed out that that Board has become a one sided advocate for "big-labor special interests."  To those who follow the NLRB, it is no surprise that is has become politicized over the years, depending upon the makeup of the Board & who appointed the Board members.  As Walker pointed out, in his opinion, the Board is beyond repair and should be eliminated. In its place, Walker would transfer the NLRB's oversight and administration of union elections, as well as the Board's role in addressing unfair labor practices, to the National Mediation Board.  (Not familiar with the National Mediation Board?  Check it out here:  http://www.nmb.gov/). 


Time will tell whether these proposals give Walker any traction on the national level.  For the time being, however, it is likely to energize his core supporters (as Walker is the toughest anti-union candidate running for President) yet also antagonize his opposition. 


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...