Skip to main content

Your Boss Stresses You Out & You Claim It Is a Disability? Might Want to Reconsider That Disability Discrimination Claim


Higgins-Williams v. Sutter Medical Foundation - California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District


Facts:  Michaelin Higgins-Williams ("Higgins-Williams") worked as a clinical assistant in Sutter's Shared Services Department.  Higgins-Williams reported to her treating physician that she was stressed because of her interactions with human resources and her manager.  After her physician diagnosed her with "adjustment disorder with anxiety", Sutter granted Higgins-Williams a stress related leave of absence for about 30 days.  

After Higgins-Williams returned to work, she received a negative performance evaluation and had additional conflicts with her manager.  Not long after, Higgins-Williams submitted a disability accommodation request form and sought to transfer to a different department and obtain an additional leave of absence.  After additional leaves of absence that last almost a year, Sutter terminated Higgins-Williams.

Higgins-Williams subsequently filed suit against Sutter and alleged disability discrimination, wrongful termination and other related claims.  The trial court granted Sutter's motion for summary judgment.

Holding:  In considering Higgins-Williams' appeal, the Court of Appeal first looked to what disabilities were recognized in California's Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA").  In this instance, Higgins-Williams alleged she suffered from an anxiety and stress induced disability as a result of her supervisor.  However, the Court was quick to rely upon prior caselaw which held that "an employee's inability to work under a particular supervisor because of anxiety and stress related to the supervisor's standard oversight of the employee's job performance does not constitute a disability under FEHA. 

Judgment:  The California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Sutter on the grounds that Higgins-Williams was not disabled, as recognized under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, simply because of her inability to work under a particular supervisor because of anxiety and stress related to the supervisor's oversight of Higgins-Williams' work.

The Takeaway:  Employees, let this case be a reminder to you:  Just because your boss/supervisor stresses you out and causes you some anxiety does not mean you are necessarily disabled and have a valid disability discrimination claim if you are terminated.  I think it is safe to say that we have all had a boss at one point or another who caused us to lose sleep, get our blood pressure up, etc.  However, that alone does not necessarily mean a disability discrimination claim exists.  If that were the case, I think the courts would be even more overrun than they already are...

Majority Opinion Judge:  Judge Butz

Date:  May 26, 2015

Opinion:  https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCEQFjAAahUKEwi5uMC12oXHAhUQD5IKHQm8D5k&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.courts.ca.gov%2Fopinions%2Fdocuments%2FC073677.PDF&ei=H5e7VfmsDZCeyASJ-L7ICQ&usg=AFQjCNFgg87XaAnwK_6FFOBGa6vNhtb_lg&sig2=aF0lEtRr0eoMMxytcK9eOA&bvm=bv.99261572,d.aWw

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more