Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Without a doubt, one of the more talked about topics that I came across this week dealt with potential changes to overtime exemptions under the FLSA.  It is still early and these changes might never actually occur.  However, if they do, there will be many, many employers and employees alike who will be impacted.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Is FMLA Leave Allowed So An Employee Can Attend to An Autistic Child?

This was one of the more interesting FMLA related articles I came across recently.  I wanted to draw readers' attention to this one as Jeff Nowak does a great job walking through the issue of whether FMLA leave is allowed for employees to care for autistic children.  While there might not be a clear cut answer on this matter, Jeff provides the reader with the foundation to better understand the issue and and comprehend some of the finer points of the FMLA.



Robin Largent has a well written note on the Department of Labor's recently announced proposed changes to the white-collar overtime exemption under the FLSA.  Under the proposed changes, to qualify as exempt, employees would now need to be paid at least $970/week (rather than the current $455/week).  As well, the "highly compensated" employee exception would require these employees receive a minimum salary of $122,148/year (rather than the current $100,000/year).  Time will tell whether these proposed changes become law...but this is the first step in that direction.


Employers Beware: Retaliation Claims Can Prove Disastrous

At one point or another, many employers deal with retaliation claims from their employees.  Charlie Plumb provides an example of an employer who dealt with a retaliatory discharge claim from a former employee and conduct the employer undertook which could expose them to liability.  Certainly an interesting situation for employers to study.  Let this example be a warning of what actions to consider avoiding.


Is President Obama About to Flip the Employment Application Process on its Head?

Readers might remember some of my articles on Ban the Box measures in cities and states around the country.  Proponents of these bills argue that an applicant's criminal history should not be taken into consideration from the initial point of application; and instead should come into play only after a conditional offer of employment has been made.  As Lindsay Blakely notes, President Obama's recent comments on the topic and the importance of giving workers with a criminal record a fair chance at a job might just push this issue even further into the forefront of employment discussions in this country.  Stay tuned...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more