Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Without a doubt, one of the more talked about topics that I came across this week dealt with potential changes to overtime exemptions under the FLSA.  It is still early and these changes might never actually occur.  However, if they do, there will be many, many employers and employees alike who will be impacted.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Is FMLA Leave Allowed So An Employee Can Attend to An Autistic Child?

This was one of the more interesting FMLA related articles I came across recently.  I wanted to draw readers' attention to this one as Jeff Nowak does a great job walking through the issue of whether FMLA leave is allowed for employees to care for autistic children.  While there might not be a clear cut answer on this matter, Jeff provides the reader with the foundation to better understand the issue and and comprehend some of the finer points of the FMLA.



Robin Largent has a well written note on the Department of Labor's recently announced proposed changes to the white-collar overtime exemption under the FLSA.  Under the proposed changes, to qualify as exempt, employees would now need to be paid at least $970/week (rather than the current $455/week).  As well, the "highly compensated" employee exception would require these employees receive a minimum salary of $122,148/year (rather than the current $100,000/year).  Time will tell whether these proposed changes become law...but this is the first step in that direction.


Employers Beware: Retaliation Claims Can Prove Disastrous

At one point or another, many employers deal with retaliation claims from their employees.  Charlie Plumb provides an example of an employer who dealt with a retaliatory discharge claim from a former employee and conduct the employer undertook which could expose them to liability.  Certainly an interesting situation for employers to study.  Let this example be a warning of what actions to consider avoiding.


Is President Obama About to Flip the Employment Application Process on its Head?

Readers might remember some of my articles on Ban the Box measures in cities and states around the country.  Proponents of these bills argue that an applicant's criminal history should not be taken into consideration from the initial point of application; and instead should come into play only after a conditional offer of employment has been made.  As Lindsay Blakely notes, President Obama's recent comments on the topic and the importance of giving workers with a criminal record a fair chance at a job might just push this issue even further into the forefront of employment discussions in this country.  Stay tuned...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more