Skip to main content

Breaking: California Governor Signs Bill That Provides Labor Protections to Cheerleaders


Back in May, I had posted a note on California Bill AB 202 that was moving through the California legislature.  (AB 202 Could Provide Labor Protections For Cheerleaders).  That bill proposed that cheerleaders for professional sports teams would be entitled to receive minimum wage, workers' compensation, and other employment benefits.  At the time, the bill had been approved by the state Assembly and was moving forward in the Senate. 

Yesterday, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law that piece of legislation.  This new law is groundbreaking in several respects, namely that the cheerleaders will now be designated as employees rather than independent contractors.  As a result, cheerleaders in the state will now be entitled to paid sick leave, meal and rest breaks, and other benefits that other workers in hourly jobs enjoy.

This is a big change from how cheerleaders in California have typically been treated previously.  Some readers might remember that a lawsuit from an Oakland Raiders cheerleader is what really started the ball rolling on efforts to reform and improve the protections for professional cheerleaders.  (Oakland Raiders Cheerleader Files Wage & Hour Suit).

While the law does not become effective until January 1, 2016, it is still a major victory for proponents of more employment protections for cheerleaders.  Whether this law will have any impact on other states remains to be seen.  However at this time, New York legislators are considering a similar proposal to the bill signed into law in California.  

Stay tuned, California might have started a ripple effect here.


For additional information, see the L.A. Times article:  http://www.latimes.com/local/political/la-me-pc-cheerleader-employee-protections-20150715-story.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more