Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Some very interesting reading this week.  My favorite by far was the article on the Suitable Seating Requirement in California.  This is one of the finer legal issues that is being litigated across the state which has led to some very interesting litigation.


How Will the Suitable Seating Requirement Impact the Hospitality Industry?

One of the more interesting legal issues surrounds how the "suitable seating" provision in California will impact the hospitality industry.  The suitable seating requirement requires some employers to provide "suitable seating" to some employees when the "nature of the work" would "reasonably permit it."  There is a great deal of confusion about the interpretation of this law which has left court's (and parties) unsure of how it applies.  The issue is currently before the California Supreme Court for clarification.  Michael Kun has a few thoughts about the issue and how the interpretation of the suitable seating provision could impact employers and employees in the hospitality industry.


Make Sure to Follow Up With Complaining Party at End of Workplace Investigation

While it may seem commonsense, this brief article notes the importance of following up with the complaining party at the end of a workplace investigation.  This note reminds employers of the importance of providing the complaining party with at the very least, a conclusion of the investigation results.


Putting Together a Sensible Social Media Policy

Jason Shinn has a good article on whether employers should be able to monitor their employees' social media posts as well as whether social media posts should be considered in the interview process.  The article includes a good discussion of the factors that should be balanced when considering what type of social media policy to set and includes a few insightful benefits and possible harms that could arise.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Vetoes Minimum Wage Hike

A few months ago, readers might remember that I pointed out that the New Jersey Legislature had voted to approve a minimum wage hike in the state .  Under the approved legislation, the minimum wage rate would rise to $10.10/hour in the next year and at least $15/hour over the next five.  (The current minimum wage rate in the state is $8.38/hour).  In that article, I had noted that the bill was then going to go before Governor Chris Christie for his approval or veto. As I had suggested previously, I thought that the Governor would likely veto the bill based upon his prior actions and comments on similar legislation.  Well, a few days ago, Governor Christie did just that and vetoed the bill on the grounds that it "would trigger an escalation of wages that will make doing business in New Jersey unfathomable."  Pointing to the increase in hourly minimum wage rates, the Governor referred to the bill as a "really radical increase."  (It is interesting to c...