Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

Some readers might have heard about the election on Tuesday.  Even as of this writing, there are still several races left undecided (namely the race for President, although some networks have just called the race for Joe Biden.)  While I do give nod to a potential Cabinet pick should Biden officially reach the 270 threshold for delegates, I did want to focus on two relevant ballot initiatives that voters decided upon this week.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Secretary of Labor Bernie Sanders? Perhaps...

Prior to this week’s election, Politico published an article that reported Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders (who many might recall is a former candidate for President) had expressed interest in becoming Labor Secretary under a President Biden administration.  What might a Department of Labor look like under Bernie Sanders?  For starters, I think we would see an aggressive slant toward employees.  That would likely include a push for a higher federal minimum wage rate, stronger protections for LGBTQ workers, and an overall movement for more rights for workers.  Whether this potential nomination ever comes to fruition remains to be seen.  However, should it happen, employers would likely be in an untenable position so long as Secretary Sanders remained at the helm of the Department of Labor.


Uber & Lyft Score Major Victory With Approval of California’s Prop 22

With nearly 59% of voters in California voting yes on Prop 22, Uber & Lyft have managed to exempt their drivers from Assembly Bill 5.  What does that mean?  In short, these drivers will not be classified as employees and instead will be classified as independent contractors.  With approximately $203 million spent to support Prop 22, this is what I would call money well spent.  Now attention will turn to whether these gif companies can start to rack up similar victories in other states as they seek to have their drivers remain classified as independent contractors.


By Narrow Margin, Florida Voters Approve $15/Hour Minimum Wage Rate

On Tuesday, Florida voters approved Amendment 2 with 60.8% of votes in favor of raising the state’s hourly minimum wage rate to $15/hour by 2026.  (Bear in mind, the measure needed to be approved by at least 60% of voters to pass.  Polls over the past few months had indicated support slipping dangerously close to that threshold number heading into the vote.)  As Eli Rosenberg over at The Washington Post pointed out that this result was a decisive victory for progressives that had waged a hard fought battle to raise the state’s hourly minimum wage rate.  At this point, I would start to look at other potential swing states (along the lines of Florida) that would might take steps to put forth a similar minimum wage ballot measure.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...