Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: Work From Home Edition


Yet another week of (work from home) work has come and gone.  With that comes the opportunity to look at a few articles which have taken a deep dive into the dynamics of work from home...both from the perspective of those impacted by the large number of workers that are currently working remotely as well as from the viewpoint of the workers themselves.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



On Monday, Google announced that it was extending the option for most of its employees to work from home through June of 2021.  As The San Francisco Chronicle reports, with many of the company’s employees already working remotely, there has been a noticeable dip in the housing market in the Bay Area, a plunge in leases in the area, and a direct hit to San Francisco’s bars and restaurants.  (With much of the company’s employees being located in the Bay Area, this would undoubtedly be an area severely hampered by having many of Google’s employees not in the office.)   With this announcement of an even longer work from home option being provided to employers, it is somewhat sobering to think of the effect this will continue to have on the Bay Area over the coming months.



Eleanor Cummins at Vox write a recent article which tracked the emergence of work from home as an option for workers from some of its earlier roots in the 1970’s through today.  In the article, attention is paid to large scale employers such as Yahoo, IBM, and FaceBook in an effort to show that while work from home has curtailed in recent years (before the coronavirus pandemic started, only about 14% of workers in the country worked from home five or more days per week), that has taken a sharp reversal.  However, with nearly half the workforce working from home now, the prevalence of distractions from work abound.  Although the article does not give employers or employees a full proof guide on how to cut out the distractions, it does provide a few stories about how some workers are coping that I believe are worth a read.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...

Senator Bernie Sanders To Introduce Bill Requiring Large Corporations To Pay For Federal Assistance Programs

Next week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to introduce legislation which would require large employers such as Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's to fully cover the cost of food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and other federal assistance programs that their employees receive.  Senator Sanders has stated that the goal is to force these large employers to pay their employees a living wage and cut back on the nearly $150 billion in taxpayer dollars that go toward funding these federal programs every year. As for the specifics, a 100% tax on government benefits received would be imposed on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees.  For instance, if a Walmart employee received $500 in food stamps, Walmart would be taxed $500. To call this proposed legislation groundbreaking would be an understatement.  I would expect that Senator Sanders, an Independent that caucuses with Democrats, is going to face an uphill battle gett...