Skip to main content

NLRB Scales Back ‘Ambush Election Rule’


Last Friday, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) announced it was had finalized a change to the rules in regard to union elections and how quickly they can occur.

Readers will recall that since the ‘Ambush Election Rule’ came into effect in 2015, employers have cried foul over how quickly a union election can occur (which often leaves employers limited time in which to mount a campaign against unionization.)  The ’Ambush Election Rule’ allows a union election to occur as quickly as 13 days from the date a petition is filed.  Needless to say, this short timeframe has been viewed as more favorable to unions in so much as they can quickly get an election without employees often hearing the ‘other side’ from their employers.

Following the NLRB assuming a more Republican tilt in recent years, attention had turned to when, not if, changes would be made.  With last Friday’s announcement, the NLRB announced that while it was not scrapping the ’Ambush Election Rule’ in its entirety, it was significantly scaling it back.  Of note:  1) the pre-election hearing will generally be scheduled 14 business days from the notice of hearing (rather than the current 8 calendar days); 2) the notice of petition for election will be posted within 5 business days after the notice of hearing (rather than the current 2 business days); 3) the non-petitioning party will have 8 business days after the notice of hearing to file a statement of petition (rather than the current 7 calendar days); and 4) union elections will not be scheduled before the 20th business day after the direction of election (rather than the current rules which allow an election to occur as soon as 13 days.)

I call attention in particular to how the NLRB has changed a lot of the timeframes from calendar days to business days.  So just because a timeframe is now 14 business days does not mean that window will close in 14 days.

These changes to the ’Ambush Election Rule’ should be favorable, and well received, among employers.  These changes are set to go into effect April 16, 2020 (120 days after the changes are published in the Federal Register.)


For additional information:  https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.natlawreview.com/article/labor-board-dials-back-ambush-election-rules%3famp

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more