Skip to main content

Could Missouri's Right to Work Law End Up on the 2018 Ballot? Unions Are Certainly Trying


This past February, Missouri Republican Governor Eric Greitens signed a bill that would make Missouri a right to work state.  (The right to work bill would prevent employers from mandating union membership as a condition of employment).

Unsurprisingly, unions were quick to criticize the bill as a job killer with Democrats in the state trying to find ways to stop the implementation of the bill.  The prevailing notion to contest the right to work bill was to collect enough signatures to get the matter on the 2018 ballot.  Although only 100,000 notarized signatures are needed to force a vote, it was recently announced that 300,000 signatures had been gathered to support putting the right to work measure on the 2018 ballot for voters to decide upon.  (It is always a good idea to get more signatures than necessary as many signatures are often contested, illegible, signed by people not registered to vote in the state, etc.  As a result, if more signatures are submitted than what is required, it limits some of the risk if certain signatures are excluded.  In this instance, it looks like opponents of the right to work bill went above and beyond to make sure they compiled enough signatures to force a vote).

If opponents of the right to work bill are successful, right to work will be put on hold in the state until the outcome of the vote next year.  However, if it is determined that 100,000 valid signatures were not submitted, the bill is set to take effect on August 28th.  It is expected that the signatures will be submitted to the Missouri Secretary of State tomorrow.  

Not to be outdone, however, there has been approximately $600,000.00 contributed recently to political action committees that are working to ensure a smooth implementation of the right to work bill.  Whether this money is sufficient to hold off the ballot initiative that unions are seeking is hard to say, although perhaps this money would be better spent on an expected 2018 fight should this matter go before voters.  I would expect the months leading up to that vote to be quite costly and likely very contentious.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more