Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


With the 4th of July holiday this week, I would like to say I spent half the week on a beach or poolside with a drink in hand.  However, a few things at work kept me tied up and required me to be in the office a majority of the week.  However, during a few lunch breaks, I found time to read a couple good articles, in particular one that addresses the sexual harassment workplace issues continuing to face Fox.  The article from The Los Angeles Times gives a good context to the matter (and perhaps should give employers a reason to examine their own workplace culture to limit similar issues).

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Fox Terminates Its Head of Sports Programming Over Sexual Harassment Allegations

Recently, Fox terminated its head of sports programming, Jamie Horowitz, after initial investigations had been launched over allegations of sexual harassment in the company's sports division.  Horowitz, who had been a major player in the company's Fox Sports wing, claimed to have been taken by surprise over the abrupt termination.  As Meg James at The Los Angeles Times writes (and readers are likely aware), Fox has been struggling to deal with a sexual harassment scandal within its Fox News division for the better part of a year.  Perhaps this was a situation where executives at Fox saw the potential for additional exposure and bad press if they did not act immediately to deal with Horowitz's alleged misconduct, given the scandal at Fox News has engulfed that division.  Whether this immediate termination will prove to have been the proper course of action for Fox to take is still anyone's guess without more information being known at this time.  

With that being said, these initial investigations and interviews that Fox conducted after being alerted to the alleged misconduct should give employers reason to pause:  If an initial investigation establishes an employee acted inappropriately, broke company rules/regulations, etc., and additional exposure to the employer exists if they do not take immediate action to correct the misconduct, it might be prudent to remedy the problem at once.


How Long Will The Tight Job Market Last For Select Workers?

One of the more thought provoking articles that I have read in some time comes from Don Lee over at The Los Angeles Times with his article addressing how long the tight job market might last (which has been shown to benefit disabled workers, felons, and others who are hard to employ).  As Lee points out, as the U.S. enters its ninth year of economic expansion, the low unemployment numbers and tightening labor market have opened doors for a wide variety of workers.  In his article, Lee identifies a worker in L.A. who has been in and out of prison over the last 20 years but has recently found stable work and is pursuing a healthcare peer specialist position (given the increased need for workers in a variety of fields).  As mentioned, the question is how long this favorable job market will exist...at some point, the bubble will burst and these workers will struggle to find a position.  But for the time being, as Lee writes, work abounds.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more