Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Frlekin v. Apple, United States District Court, Northern District of California


As with many employment and labor law related cases that are being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Facts:  Plaintiffs, Amanda Frlekin, Taylor Kalin, Aaron Gregoroff, Seth Dowling, and Debra Speicher, filed a suit against Apple on behalf of themselves and over 12,400 current and former Apple retail store workers from 52 California locations on the grounds that they should be compensated for time spent in security screenings after leaving work.

The Main Issue:  Is the time that an employee spends in a security screening line after leaving work for the day, and after having already clocked out, compensable time?

Current Status:  On July 16, 2015, the Court approved the Plaintiffs' motion to certify the class. 

Looking Ahead:  For those that may remember, the United States Supreme Court ruled on a similar case late last year and held that time that employees spent in security screenings after leaving work was not compensable time under the Fair Labor Standards Act.  (Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk - United States Supreme Court).  As well, the United States Supreme Court held back in January 2014 that time that employees spent changing in and out of protective clothing for work related activities was also not compensable time under the Fair Labor Standards Act.  (Sandifer v. United States Steel - United States Supreme Court).  

Given that this case involves California caselaw (and could be appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals), gives me some reason to pause.  In Integrity Staffing Solutions, the Ninth Circuit held that activities become compensable if they are done for the employer's benefit.  In that case, the Ninth Circuit held the security screenings were for the employer's benefit.  That is the same instance here.  My guess is, should this case reach the Ninth Circuit, it is probable they would reach the same conclusion.

However, this case is still at the trial court level.  Assuming this District Court follows California caselaw and the holdings from recent Supreme Court cases, I would expect Apple to likely prevail at this stage of litigation.


For additional information:  http://www.natlawreview.com/article/apple-amazon-and-wage-payment-issues-arising-employee-security-screenings

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more