Skip to main content

NLRB: New Rules Issued For Ambush Elections in Representation Proceedings - With Update!


The National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") certainly had a busy end to 2014.  Notwithstanding the ground breaking ruling in Purple Communications which allows employees access to employer e-mail systems to engage in union organizing, the NLRB also issued new rules for ambush elections (or "quickie elections") in representation proceedings which means union elections are likely to occur within 21 days.  

The new rule, set to take effect on April 14, 2015, will drastically shorten the time between the filing of a certification petition and the conduct of an NLRB secret ballot election.  Note, the new rule does not require that an election occur within a certain period of time, but by overhauling the NLRB representation case procedures, I would expect it would reduce campaign time to 21 - 24 days, and maybe even less than that.  That ultimately means that union elections will occur at a much quicker pace and time frame than employers prefer. 

Perhaps one of the more important aspects of the new rule is that it eliminates pre-election evidentiary hearings and requests for review and defers decisions on virtually all issues in regard to appropriateness of units and voter eligibility now decided at the pre-election stage

The new rule also requires that employers provide unions with "Excelsior lists" which include telephone numbers (including cell phone numbers), e-mail addresses, in addition to employees' names and addresses.  This potentially will have a major impact as employers will now be required to turn over this information on their employees to unions, which unions can use for organizing purposes. 


Additional information can be found here:  http://www.nlrb.gov/news-outreach/news-story/nlrb-issues-final-rule-modernize-representation-case-procedures

A link to the December 15, 2014 Federal Register which includes more details on the new ambush election/quickie election rules:  http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-12-15/pdf/2014-28777.pdf


UPDATE:  Two lawsuits have been filed recently to challenge the new quickie election rules, one in District Court for the District of Columbia and the other in District Court for the Western District of Texas.  

The suit filed in D.C. challenges thew new rules on the grounds that the NLRB exceeded its constitutional authority and violated the Administrative Procedures Act.  This first suit seeks an injunction to invalidate the new election rules.  


The suit filed in the Western District of Texas does not raise any constitutional violation but instead seeks an injunction that declares the quickie election rules invalid because 1) it conflicts with the Administrative Procedures Act, 2) the new rules conflict with the National Labor Relations Act, and 3) the new rules violate the privacy of employees by requiring personal information (phone numbers, e-mails, etc.) be turned over to the union.

A copy of the complaint for the Western District of Texas suit can be found here:  http://www.laborrelationstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/312/2015/01/ABC-v-NLRB-complaint.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies i...
Post a Comment
Read more

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...
Post a Comment
Read more