Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Work Closed Because of Storm - How Time Off & Paying Employees Works

This article goes through what employers and employees can expect to experience when an office closes because of weather and a question arises over whether the employees are entitled to be paid.  With winter storms sweeping across much of the country the past few weeks, including down south where it is not as common to experience work closures because of winter weather, this article provides a timely refresher.


Probationary Period For California Employees - How the ACA Comes Into Play

Nancy Yaffe makes note of how California employers are impacted by the Affordable Care Act ("ACA"), in regard to when employees now have to be provided healthcare benefits. While many probationary periods are ninety days, the ACA no longer permits employers to wait that full time period before offering healthcare benefits.  Under the ACA, California employers have to provide healthcare benefits to their employees within sixty days of hiring the employee.

As a result, there is now an accelerated period in which employers in California need to determine whether the employee is a good fit.  It is important for employers to note that terminating someone with healthcare benefits is often more costly and administratively burdensome than terminating someone without them.


Pregnancy - Grounds for FMLA Time Off?

Many employers will face a time where an employee becomes pregnant and has difficulty performing the usual job responsibilities as a result of the pregnancy.  The question then becomes, is FMLA leave proper for a pregnancy?  The answer is most likely yes.  This article discusses a recent case in which the court ultimately held that FMLA leave was proper, even though the employee was healthy, when a pregnancy limited what she could do on the job.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

Happening Tomorrow: Connecticut’s Minimum Wage Increases

For those employers and employees alike in Connecticut, mark your calendars as tomorrow, the minimum wage rate increases in the state from $13/hour to $14/hour. This wage hike comes after Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont had signed Public Act 19-4 into law in 2019 which progressively raised the state’s hourly minimum wage rate every year for five years.  In fact, next year, the hourly wage rate will top out at $15/hour.  Beginning in January of 2024, the hourly wage rate will be indexed to the employment cost index. For additional information:   https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-the-Governor/News/Press-Releases/2022/06-2022/Governor-Lamont-Reminds-Residents-That-Minimum-Wage-Is-Scheduled-To-Increase-on-Friday

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa