Skip to main content

The Georgia Senate Run Off Election & Federal Minimum Wage Rates For Illegal Immigrants

 

In a few short weeks, voters in Georgia will head back to the polls to cast their vote in two Senate run off elections between Republican Senator David Perdue and challenger Democrat Jon Ossoff and Republican Senator Kelly Loeffler and Democrat Raphael Warnock.

With the outcome of that race determining whether Republicans or Democrats will have majority control of the U.S. Senate, there has been a lot of attention paid to these run off elections.  Of note, Democratic challenger Jon Ossoff made news this past weekend at a campaign event.  In response to a question from an attendee at the event, Ossoff stated that he believed illegal immigrants should be paid the federal minimum wage rate.  In his remarks, Ossoff stated that federal immigration authorities should be in charge of ensuring this federal minimum wage rate is paid to these workers.

Ossoff has argued that a large swath of workers in the state’s agriculture sector are comprised of Latino immigrants, some of whom are illegal aliens, are taken advantage of because of their illegal status.  According to Ossoff, these workers are paid less than the federal minimum wage rate and are abused by employers.  It follows, according to Ossoff, that if these illegal immigrants are paid the federal minimum wage rate, employers would not be able to continue to abuse or taken advantage of them by paying them a substandard wage rate.

Whether Ossoff would actually be able to implement a change to the pay rate for illegal immigrants if he were elected to the Senate remains to be seen.  Depending the outcome of the run off election in January, we might just see.  Stay tuned.


For additional information:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ossoff-ice-illegal-immigrants-paid-minimum-wage

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more