Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

Another week down and another debate in the books.  Following last week’s debate between President Donald Trump and Democratic candidate Joe Biden, Vice President Mike Pence and Senator Kamala Harris sat down on Wednesday to talk about several topics ahead of the November 3rd election.  While I will refer readers to other resources which dissect that debate in minute detail (including the cameo appearance by a particular fly), a recent podcast on social media posts and the 2020 election is relevant to this week’s political developments and Wednesday’s debate.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


President Trump Issues Executive Order Banning Racial Sensitivity Training

At the end of September, President Donald Trump issued an executive order in which he banned training that involved race and sex based discrimination.  The executive order is quite far reaching as it applies to executive departments and agencies, the U.S. military, federal contractors, and federal grant recipients.  Although note, that this does not extend to private employers (so long as they do not have federal contracts.)  In his remarks following the release of the executive order, President Trump stated the ban was needed to do away with training that perpetuated stereotypes and division.  Critics have been quick to call this executive order as an attempt to whitewash America’s history and risks exposing minorities to an onslaught of discrimination in the workplace.  Regardless of which way you lean on this matter, I would suggest giving the text of the executive order  review and forming your own thoughts.


Conducting Performance Reviews in the Age of COVID-19 & Work From Home

Pamela DeLoatch over at HRDive recently wrote an article that addressed how employers can conduct performance reviews, given that many employees continue to work remotely.  The main takeaway:  Be flexible and willing to adapt, given that the work environment has changed.  With that being said, regardless of whether you are an employer or employee, this article is worth reviewing.


Employees, Social Media Posts, & the 2020 Election

Earlier this month, David Weisenfeld, Jon Hyman, and Robin Shea sat down to talk about the use of social media by employees during the 2020 election cycle.  While readers can listen to the podcast in their free time, there is a transcript of the discussion available for those that would prefer that option.  In short, while each situation is different and there is no clear cut rule to apply in all situations, generally speaking, employers can hold employees responsible for posts on their social media accounts (including during this election cycle.)  This podcast/transcript is well worth reviewing.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more