Skip to main content

New Laws for 2020: Senate Bill 2193 (Hawaii)

 

On September 15th, Hawaii Governor David Ige signed Senate Bill 2193 into law which impacts the state’s ban the box legislation, which has been in effect since 1998.

Prior to the passage of Senate Bill 2193, the state’s ban the box legislation had a ten year “look back” period in which employers could consider felony and misdemeanor convictions of applicants.  Any felony or misdemeanor convictions past ten years could not be considered when choosing whether to hire the applicant.  The ban the box legislation also required employers to apply a “rational relationship” test before they could deny an employment position after conducting a background check.  Under this “rational relationship” test, an employer could only consider those convictions that occurred within the ten year window if there was a “rational relationship” between the conviction and the prospective job.

Senate Bill 2193 rewrites the state’s ban the box legislation in a few ways:  1) Felonies older than seven years and misdemeanors older than five years are no longer to be considered (unless they fall within one of several statutory exemptions); and 2) a suitability determination (in regard to the relevant criminal history) may not occur until after the conditional job offer has been made.

While minimum wage legislation has been all the rage in the past few years, this is a noteworthy development in the area of ban the box legislation.


For a copy of Senate Bill 2193:  https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2020/Bills/GM1156_.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more