Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


It seems to have been the case many weeks so far this year, but this one in particular was somewhat more hectic with work travel than the past few.  With very little spare time, I did not have much of a chance to read through articles, but the two below are worth highlighting.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Some Workers See Wage Growth (Thanks to Wage Hikes); Others See Decline

Perhaps we should call this conversation, water is wet.  After all, I do not think it should come as much of a surprise that hourly workers in states that have raised hourly wage rates have seen a 4% wage growth.  On the other hand, for workers in states that have not seen wage hikes, it also should not come as a shock that these workers have seen a - .5% wage growth.  With that being said, this study from the National Employment Law Project is Worth a read for a more nuanced discussion on the topic.


Democratic Presidential Candidate Tom Steyer Proposes $22/Hour Minimum Wage Rate

Let us call this one of the most progressive positions during the 2020 primary cycle.  Last Sunday, Democratic Presidential candidate Tom Steyer was in South Carolina, ahead of the state‘s primary in a few weeks, during which Steyer announced that he would seek to raise the federal hourly minimum wage rate to $22/hour if elected President.  Readers might recall that there has been broad support for a $15/hour minimum wage rate...but $22/hour is a whole other story.  While Steyer’s candidacy is expected to fall short, might the Democratic platform include an hourly wage rate above $15/hour?  Time will tell, although I would not be surprised if Steyer’s $22/hour wage proposal helps propel the conversation forward before the Democratic convention in Milwaukee this summer.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more