Skip to main content

Department of Labor Appeals Overtime Rule Injunction


A few weeks ago, I updated readers on the status of the overtime rule that had previously been announced during President Barack Obama's time in office.  That proposed rule sought to raise the overtime threshold and would have required employers to pay overtime to employees that earned less than $47,476.00 per year (up from the current "cut off" of $23,660.00 per year.)

Before the new overtime rule went into effect, late last year, a Federal judge in Texas issued a preliminary injunction that blocked the implementation of the rule.  When President Donald Trump came into office, it was widely expected his Department of Labor would not appeal the preliminary injunction.  Subsequent to President Trump taking office, the judge who issued the preliminary injunction granted summary judgment in the case which made the injunction permanent.

To the surprise of some, this week, the Department of Labor appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.  The Department of Labor couched its appeal with a recognition that it was done, in part, to maintain the ability of the Labor Secretary, Alexander Acosta, to establish overtime regulations if he so chose.  In essence, the filing of the appeal allows the Department of Labor to preserve its options and challenge the apparent limits placed on the Department of Labor's rulemaking authority (which the Federal judge seemed to do in his order granting summary judgment.)  

Now to clarify, this is for all intents and purposes likely not an an attempt by the Department of Labor of ultimately seeking to enforce the overtime rule proposed during President Obama's term.  As noted above, this appeal seeks to clarify the scope of the Department of Labor's rulemaking authority.  Secretary Acosta and the Trump administration have previously indicated their interest in raising the overtime threshold from its current $23,660.00 per year threshold.  Something tells me we may see some movement on that front in the coming months.


For additional information:  https://www.benefitnews.com/news/dol-appeals-ruling-on-overtime-rule

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...