Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


I came across several articles in regard to parental leave this week.  Although I am not basing this post entirely on the topic, I wanted to lead things off with a few articles that I came across.  

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


IKEA To Expand Parental Leave For its Workers

As Claire Zillman over at Fortune writes, effective January 1, IKEA will offer up to four months of paid parental leave for nearly 14,000 salary and hourly workers in the U.S.  According to IKEA, this was done in an effort to attract workers to the company by way of offering a rather generous paid time off for birth, adoptive, and foster parents.  This is certainly one of the more expansive policies I have seen in recent memory.  The question is whether other companies will follow suit?  It would not surprise me if we see a few others follow suit, sooner rather than later.


D.C. Mayor Wants Changes to Family Leave Plan Before She Will Approve It

Earlier this week, a D.C. Council committee voted 11 - 2 to approve a sweeping family leave plan that would require D.C. employers to provide eight weeks of paid leave for the birth or adoption of a child and six weeks of paid leave to care for a sick relative.  The legislation, to be paid via a .62 percent payroll tax on employers has gotten the attention of D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser who has expressed concern over the impact that tax could have on small business owners.  As noted in the WTOP article, a vote by the full D.C. Council is to occur within the next few weeks before the bill would go before the Mayor for final approval.  Stay tuned.


Critical Commentary On the Injunction Blocking Implementation of the New Overtime Regulation

Readers should recall an update I posted a week or so in regard to the new overtime regulation authorized by the Obama administration.  A federal judge in Texas issued a nationwide injunction to block the implementation of that regulation (and possibly killing it entirely as the incoming Trump administration will likely find a way to permanently end it if it does not get resolved in court).  Vox published an article that was rather critical of the injunction.  I highlight this article not because I necessarily agree or disagree with the reasoning, but instead to point readers to an insightful article that breaks down the actual 'cost' this injunction will have on hourly employees who would have benefited from the new overtime regulation.  Well worth a read, regardless of your position on the overtime regulation or injunction.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more