Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Difficult to narrow things down this week, but I think it is appropriate to lead this one off with a note about President-Elect Donald Trump's nominee for Labor Secretary.  To the surprise of few, 'pro-employer' groups have cheered the news while labor unions have been quick to oppose.  Given that Republicans control Congress (and this nominee likely will not produce as much of a fight as say the nominee for Secretary of State or Attorney General), I think it is safe to assume Andrew Puzder will likely be confirmed.  For those who might have thought Tom Perez, the current Labor Secretary, was too 'union friendly', Puzder will likely be a breath of fresh air.

As always, below are several articles that caught my eye this week.


A Closer Look at Andrew Puzder, Labor Secretary Nominee

Recently, President-Elect Donald Trump announced that he would nominate Andrew Puzder to serve as Labor Secretary in his administration.  For those unfamiliar with Puzder, The Tennessean wrote a great article that gives some background on the nominee and his position on topics such as minimum wage (spoiler, he has opposed any minimum wage hikes), his tendency to favor employers (not a surprise given his background), among other topics.  Well worth a read for those interested.


Texas Congressmen Seek to Pass Law to Prohibit Ban the Box Measures in the State

Earlier this week, several Congressmen in Texas introduced House Bill 577 which would make it illegal for local governments in the state to adopt 'ban the box' measures.  According to one of the sponsors of the bill, allowing cities across the state to choose whether to have 'ban the box' measures can lead to confusion and a lack of uniformity.  In a state as big as Texas, that is actually a fairly sound argument.  However, as Madlin Mekelberg at The Dallas Morning News writes, it is expected that a competing piece of legislation will be introduced during this legislative session that would seek to 'ban the box' across the entire state.  Note, a similar statewide 'ban the box' bill was introduced in the last legislative session in 2015 but failed to pass.  Interesting to see if either bill makes any headway.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per