Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Minimum Wage Edition


This week I came across several articles dealing with the minimum wage movement that is happening in towns, cities, and states across the country.  In fact, at the most recent Democratic Presidential debate this past Sunday, all the candidates stated that raising wages would be a top priority in the first 100 days of their administration (note that Senator Bernie Sanders and Governor Martin O'Malley both stated they supported $15.00 per hour while Senator Clinton did not 'commit' to a specific hourly rate.)  Given the increased coverage this movement has started to receive, I thought it would be a good time to dedicate this post to the topic.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Santa Monica City Council Approves Minimum Wage Hike

Earlier this month, the Santa Monica City Council approved a minimum wage hike that would raise wages at most businesses in the city to $15.00 per hour by 2020.  It is interesting to note that  businesses would also be required to provide paid leave for employees beyond the minimum three days that California currently requires.  Before this new ordinance becomes official, it will have to go before the City Council for a second reading.  In this instance, six council members voted in favor while one member abstained.



Boston.com has a note on former Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney's recent comments in support of a higher federal minimum wage rate.  As the article highlights, Romney has championed a higher minimum wage rate for several years and has encouraged his party to take up the fight.  Readers might remember that in recent months, particularly at the Republican presidential debates, there has been little support for a higher federal minimum wage from most Republicans.  I question whether Romney has much influence to insert the minimum wage discussion into the Republican platform...but interesting nonetheless to see him raise the issue.



The Oregonian has provided details on a recent announcement from Oregon Governor Kate Brown who has proposed raising minimum wage rates in the state.  Under the compromise plan, two minimum wage rates would be set for Oregon:  one rate for workers in the Portland metro area and another rate for workers in the rest of the state.  For workers in Portland, the minimum wage rate would top out at $15.25 and workers in the rest of the state would see wages top out at $13.50.  Note that under this plan, the first increases would take effect in January 2017.  It goes without saying that this is a relatively progressive minimum wage proposal!



I rarely come across labor & employment law matters from Alaska...but this is a potentially big development.  As reported by the Associated Press, Alaskan state Senator Johnny Ellis has proposed raising the minimum wage in the state to $15 per hour.  This comes on the heels of voters approving a minimum wage hike back in 2014 that has put the current minimum wage rate in Alaska at $9.75 per hour.  This one is still in the early stages, but it will be interesting to see it develop.



Scott Thistle over at The Maine Sun Journal wrote a recent update on the minimum wage movement in Maine.  Recently, Mainers for Fair Wages, have collected more than 80,000 petition signatures to get a minimum wage issue on the ballot this year.  Under the proposal, Maine's current minimum wage of $7.50 per hour would increase to $12 per hour by 2025.  It is still too early to know how this one will end up, but it is one to keep an eye on this year.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more