Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Minimum Wage Edition


I came across a lot of great articles this week, especially in regard to minimum wage issues.  Given that Halloween is tomorrow, I thought this would be a good time to highlight some articles on the topic.  It really is a 'trick or treat':  a trick for a lot of employers are terrified of impending minimum wage increases, but a treat for employees who have been fighting (and continue to fight) for an increase in their hourly pay.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Where Do Republican Presidential Candidates Stand on Federal Minimum Wage Rate of $7.25/hour?

Katie Little over at MSNBC has a good overview of where each of the Republican Presidential candidates stand on the federal minimum wage rate of $7.25/hour.  Unsurprisingly, the majority of candidates either do not support raising the federal minimum wage rate or only doing so if the wage rate increase is "reasonable".  Still worth a quick read through to get a feel for where the candidates stand on the issue.


Food Workers for San Francisco Airport to Receive Minimum Wage Hike

Earlier this month, the Airport Commission in San Fransisco voted unanimously to expand the airport's minimum wage rules to include off site laborers that assemble in flight meals for airlines at the airport.  Workers that prepare these meals offsite work in location where the airport's minimum wage rates did not previously apply.  However, these workers will go from an average hourly rate of pay of $10.50 to $13.52 per hour.  As has been noted by supporters of the Fight for $15 movement, this is a step in the right direction to get these workers to an hourly wage rate of $15.00.



Ashley Gross has an interesting note on Citizens' Initiative Measure No. 1, a ballot initiative that Tacoma voters will decide upon next week.  If passed, Measure No. 1 would raise the hourly wage rate to $15.00 per hour for businesses with annual revenue of more than $300,000.00.  This change would go into effect in early December.  For those who might remember, Seattle's $15.00 per hour minimum wage rate will go into effect in 2017 for the earliest businesses impacted by the new law.  A competing measure, Tacoma City Council Initiative Measure No. 1B would phase in a $12.00 per hour minimum wage rate by 2018.


Oregon Chapter of the AFL-CIO Supports $15.00/Hour

Earlier this week, the Oregon chapter of the AFL-CIO gave its support to a ballot measure that would increase Oregon's minimum wage rate to $15.00 per hour.  At its recent convention, The Statesman Journal noted that this chapter of the labor union voted unanimously to support Oregonians for 15.  Whether this support of a ballot measure to increase the minimum wage has any impact is still unclear, but something tells me that the minimum wage rate will stands a shot at increasing in the sate in the not too distant future.  (Another ballot measure has also been proposed to increase the minimum wage rate to $13.50).


Minimum Wage Increase Could Be Coming for Lexington Workers

Recently, the Lexington, Kentucky council voted to place a three year phased in $10.10 minimum wage increase on the docket.  It is important to note that this was a divided vote and only the first hurdle that had to be cleared to raise the minimum wage rate.  



Lydia DePillis has a good note on the Service Employees International Union's 80,000 member strong United Healthcare Workers local in California that has begun an initial foray into the upcoming minimum wage increase votes in 2016.  Recently, this union has started to fund the 'Fairness Project', an organization that is working to boost minimum wage ballot measures around the country.  At this point, the Fairness Project only has "a couple million" on hand to push ballot measures across the country.  It goes without saying that if this organization (and the union) want to push ballot measures around the country, it is going to take more money to really have an impact.  Well worth keeping an eye on over the coming year.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per