Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Labor Law Edition


This was a great week where I found some time to read through several great articles, many on labor law related topics.  Given the increase of NLRB and labor law related issues in the news over the past few weeks, this is a good time to highlight those matters with a "Labor Law Edition" post.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


NLRB "Ambush" Election Rule Appears To Be Just That, An Ambush

George Miller has a good follow up on the impact of the NLRB "Ambush" Election Rule that recently went into effect earlier this year.  (NLRB "Ambush" Election Becomes a Reality).  As this article notes, the new rule has indeed shortened the time between the date of the filing of an election petition and the date of the actual election.  It goes without saying that this development has given the business community further evidence that this new rule has had an unwanted positive impact on union votes...and an incentive to be more proactive in their efforts to start campaigns to remain a non-union workplace.   


Senator Accuses NLRB and OSHA of Coordinated Effort to Change the Law

Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee recently accused the NLRB and OSHA of conspiring to change corporate liability law during a recent hearing.  The Senator pointed to the fact that OSHA officials apparently began instructing their regional directors to use the same "joint employer" standard that the NLRB adopted, one day before the NLRB released its ruling in the relevant case.  Unsurprisingly, Senator Alexander also recently introduced legislation to overturn the NLRB's new "joint employer" standard.  Time will tell if his attempts to link the NLRB and OSHA together (or undo the new "joint employer" standard) will actually gain any traction.



The Washington Post posted a good article and noted the success of the 'Summit on Worker Voice' that the White House hosted earlier this month.  (White House's 'Summit on Worker Voice' Set For October 7th).  At the Summit, President Obama discussed the importance of workers being "rewarded properly for the labor they put in...".  Other labor supporters, including House Democrats that attended the Summit, produced a report that showed the benefits of unions in the workplace as further evidence that giving workers a voice and a seat at the table has positive results for all involved.  Beyond simply getting good press for fighting for the middle class and involving a blue collar workforce in a spirited discussion, this Summit allowed President Obama to continue his efforts of putting labor issues at the forefront and giving unions a voice.  


Hillary Clinton Lends Support to Labor Union Rally in Las Vegas

Earlier this week, Hillary Clinton made an unannounced appearance at a labor union rally on Fashion Show Drive in Las Vegas (near Donald Trump's hotel) to lend support to the protesters and advocate for their right to organize and right to a minimum wage.  While Trump's hotel in Las Vegas has a no-union policy, the Culinary Union has been fighting for over a year to unionize workers at the hotel.  Now that Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker is out of the race, unions are not as much of a focal point of many candidates.  That is what makes Clinton's unscheduled visit all the more surprising.


Senator Bernie Sanders Proposes New Labor Union Bill

Last week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders announced his support of the Workplace Democracy Act which would protect employees who seek to form unions.  Given that Democrats typically receive the support of labor unions in general elections (and the fact that Sanders is fighting to get traction with Hillary running), this is a bold move to court union votes.  The Guardian article has some good insight into the uphill fight Sanders might face to win over these union votes.  Time will tell if it pays off, but Sanders is certainly playing to a traditionally Democratic base.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more