Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


I found a wide range of articles this week that I think readers will enjoy...everything from OSHA and wage and hour issues all the way to criminal background checks in California.  Something for everyone!

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


OSHA's New Rule to Protect Construction Workers in Confined Spaces

Recently, OSHA issued a new rule to protect construction workers in confined spaces.  Joe Lustig over at Joe's HR and Benefits Blog has a good look at this recent development and who it impacts.  For those interested in OSHA issues, this is a good one to review.


The New Battlefront: When An Employee Works

The Washington Post has a great article on how the new wage and hour battlefront is likely to be over when an employee works (ie work schedules and flexible scheduling bills being considered around the country), rather than simply how much an employee makes.  The article is very, very thorough and paints a broad picture of what the issues are on each side of the aisle...and where things could potentially go in the coming years.



Anthony Zaller always has some good California related topics that I enjoy reading through.  This week was no exception.  Criminal background checks have become an area in the interview process that received heightened attention across the country as Ban the Box measures have started to address the issue.  This article gives employers a few things to keep in mind when conducting criminal background checks.  Well worth a read, especially for California employers!


Take Look At the Video That Wal-Mart Has Used as an Anti-Union Deterrent

The Washington Post has a good video and brief blurb about a video that Wal-Mart has previously used to deter unionization at its stores.  I had posted some of the ways Target attempts to limit unionization at its stores in the past (How Target Deals With Union Organizing) and thought readers would enjoy a look at how another big box employer handles the issue.


Why Companies Should Offer Paid Maternity Leave

This is the second article I have read in as many weeks on the importance of companies providing paid maternity leave.  Regardless of your position on the issue,  Kevin Mason makes a couple of intriguing arguments for why companies should adopt this policy.  Will it catch on?  Maybe.  But this is something that could become a major talking point in the coming years.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more