Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: New Laws Edition


I only came across a few articles this week that really jumped out at me; namely a couple that deal with new laws that will impact California and Massachusetts employers an employees over the next few months.  I always caution employers (and employees) in states with new employment laws like these to take the time to review the specifics of the law...failure to do so could open both employers and employees up for unwanted (and avoidable) exposure.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


6 Steps California Employers Should Take in Preparation for AB 1897

This is one of the better articles I have come across in regard to the impact that AB 1897 is going to have on California employers starting January 1, 2015.  For those not familiar with AB 1897, California employers will now be on the hook when labor contractors fail to follow the law.  (ie  a California employer has a labor contractor provide workers.  The labor contractor classifies the workers as independent contractors but the government rules they are actually employees.  Guess what California employer?  You are now on the hook too).  This article has a few things that employers should review ahead of AB 1897 becoming a law.  


Massachusetts Voters Approve Paid Sick Leave Law

Earlier this month on election day, voters in Massachusetts approved a paid sick leave law (referred to on ballots as Massachusetts Ballot Question 4.  Under the law set to take effect on July 1, 2015, employees that work in Massachusetts are entitled to earn and use sick time.  In essence, employees who work for employers that have 11 or more employees may earn up to 40 hours of paid sick time per calendar year.  Employees who work for employers with 10 or fewer employees may earn and use up to 40 hours of unpaid sick time per calendar year.  The article I have linked to this note includes additional information that both Massachusetts employers and employees should review.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more